<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there any CIO/CTO out there who is still inclined to answer a desk phone?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone</link>
	<description>Intensely practical tips on information technology management, by Peter Kretzman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Bundy</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-9182</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/#comment-9182</guid>
		<description>Yup, agree! And I love the last line: &quot;...why do we still have desk phones at all?&quot;

I took a similar stance also a few years ago. 
1) *Never* answered unrecognized calls. (And, you&#039;re also right, &quot;recognition&quot; has been way better via cell phones that PBX systems - for external callers.)
2) *Never* listened to the complete voice mail -- just pressed the &quot;delete&quot; function mid playback -- unless, it was a genuine caller and supplier/partner with whom I already had a relationship or was interested in developing a relationship.
3) Last gig, actually had 2 numbers: 1) that the corporate receptionist gave out / transferred people to. That number went directly to vmail and never actually rang to a real phone. 2) my &quot;real&quot; number that I gave out to people I genuinely wanted to be available by phone for. (Also had 2 different business cards printed.)
4) Also developed a standard &quot;CIO&quot; address email (i.e. cio@xyz.com) for those business services that learned to market via email. 
Never did reach Nirvana though. Was looking for an intelligent directory that would &quot;screen pop&quot; the resulting inbound number based on at least 2 sources: 1) corporate address book, and 2) *very* important, personal/professional address book. Otherwise, with no/little information about the caller coming through, and unless I actually visually recognized the number, the call went to vmail. Your/my tactics seem so &quot;20th Century&quot;; I hope someone sheds some 21st Century solutions on the topic. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, agree! And I love the last line: &#8220;&#8230;why do we still have desk phones at all?&#8221;</p>
<p>I took a similar stance also a few years ago.<br />
1) *Never* answered unrecognized calls. (And, you&#8217;re also right, &#8220;recognition&#8221; has been way better via cell phones that PBX systems &#8211; for external callers.)<br />
2) *Never* listened to the complete voice mail &#8212; just pressed the &#8220;delete&#8221; function mid playback &#8212; unless, it was a genuine caller and supplier/partner with whom I already had a relationship or was interested in developing a relationship.<br />
3) Last gig, actually had 2 numbers: 1) that the corporate receptionist gave out / transferred people to. That number went directly to vmail and never actually rang to a real phone. 2) my &#8220;real&#8221; number that I gave out to people I genuinely wanted to be available by phone for. (Also had 2 different business cards printed.)<br />
4) Also developed a standard &#8220;CIO&#8221; address email (i.e. <a href="mailto:cio@xyz.com">cio@xyz.com</a>) for those business services that learned to market via email.<br />
Never did reach Nirvana though. Was looking for an intelligent directory that would &#8220;screen pop&#8221; the resulting inbound number based on at least 2 sources: 1) corporate address book, and 2) *very* important, personal/professional address book. Otherwise, with no/little information about the caller coming through, and unless I actually visually recognized the number, the call went to vmail. Your/my tactics seem so &#8220;20th Century&#8221;; I hope someone sheds some 21st Century solutions on the topic. <img src='http://www.peterkretzman.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starve your voice mail, feed your e-mail</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/comment-page-1/#comment-1456</link>
		<dc:creator>Starve your voice mail, feed your e-mail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/21/is-there-any-ciocto-out-there-who-is-still-able-to-answer-his-desk-phone/#comment-1456</guid>
		<description>[...] touched on this topic briefly before, but here&#8217;s a lengthier discussion on why, in general, I find e-mail to be vastly preferable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] touched on this topic briefly before, but here&#8217;s a lengthier discussion on why, in general, I find e-mail to be vastly preferable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

