<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cementing a formal work initiation process for IT projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects</link>
	<description>Intensely practical tips on information technology management, by Peter Kretzman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:37:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Romero, IT Governance Evangelist</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-8912</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Romero, IT Governance Evangelist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/#comment-8912</guid>
		<description>Peter, as usual, a very good post with great recommendations. I continue to encounter organizations without formal work initiation processes and they struggle mightily under the onslaught of unreasonable and irrational workloads.

My PPM and PMO presentations include a slide that depicts the project initiation spaghetti between IT and the business and a following slide replacing the spaghetti with a single arrow (representative of the formal work initiation process you describe). Many folks wince at the graphic but I quickly address their concerns about bureaucracy and bottleneck by pointing out the single-arrow is conceptual. An organization may deem it appropriate to establish and manage multiple formal work-request channels - optimized to specific request types. The single-arrow is used to represent the aggregate, pragmatic, formal management of project work requests.

I don&#039;t care if it is one request channel or a dozen, as long as it is formal: appropriately designed, thoughtfully and thoroughly implemented, and diligently managed.

Steve Romero, IT Governance Evangelist
http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter, as usual, a very good post with great recommendations. I continue to encounter organizations without formal work initiation processes and they struggle mightily under the onslaught of unreasonable and irrational workloads.</p>
<p>My PPM and PMO presentations include a slide that depicts the project initiation spaghetti between IT and the business and a following slide replacing the spaghetti with a single arrow (representative of the formal work initiation process you describe). Many folks wince at the graphic but I quickly address their concerns about bureaucracy and bottleneck by pointing out the single-arrow is conceptual. An organization may deem it appropriate to establish and manage multiple formal work-request channels &#8211; optimized to specific request types. The single-arrow is used to represent the aggregate, pragmatic, formal management of project work requests.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care if it is one request channel or a dozen, as long as it is formal: appropriately designed, thoughtfully and thoroughly implemented, and diligently managed.</p>
<p>Steve Romero, IT Governance Evangelist<br />
<a href="http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/" rel="nofollow">http://community.ca.com/blogs/theitgovernanceevangelist/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark W Schumann</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-8909</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark W Schumann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/#comment-8909</guid>
		<description>Yes! What you said!

It&#039;s funny, I&#039;m one of those people who&#039;s impatient with a lot of Agile things because they&#039;re too structured (!) but you really do need a scope, even if it&#039;s &quot;keep working through the card deck until you&#039;re out of money.&quot; And a customer, even if it&#039;s yourself. And an ROI, even if it&#039;s acknowledged that the return is purely speculative or perhaps just fun.

You have to know &lt;em&gt;what the project is&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;who wants it done&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;why it matters&lt;/em&gt;. At the very least. No matter how flexible and crazy your development process is supposed to be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes! What you said!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny, I&#8217;m one of those people who&#8217;s impatient with a lot of Agile things because they&#8217;re too structured (!) but you really do need a scope, even if it&#8217;s &#8220;keep working through the card deck until you&#8217;re out of money.&#8221; And a customer, even if it&#8217;s yourself. And an ROI, even if it&#8217;s acknowledged that the return is purely speculative or perhaps just fun.</p>
<p>You have to know <em>what the project is</em>, <em>who wants it done</em>, and <em>why it matters</em>. At the very least. No matter how flexible and crazy your development process is supposed to be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canaries in the coal mine: Why your IT department may be in worse shape than you think</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/comment-page-1/#comment-8617</link>
		<dc:creator>Canaries in the coal mine: Why your IT department may be in worse shape than you think</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 21:13:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/01/25/cementing-a-formal-work-initiation-process-for-it-projects/#comment-8617</guid>
		<description>[...] There’s no published list of projects underway, along with commitment dates: a public report card. If IT isn’t formally and publicly accountable for delivery, that’s the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There’s no published list of projects underway, along with commitment dates: a public report card. If IT isn’t formally and publicly accountable for delivery, that’s the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
