<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Offshore software development: the reasons why not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not</link>
	<description>Intensely practical tips on information technology management, by Peter Kretzman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A rational CapEx purchase and tracking process for IT</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-11658</link>
		<dc:creator>A rational CapEx purchase and tracking process for IT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/#comment-11658</guid>
		<description>[...] analysis document for each project? That&#8217;s an excellent place to make sure that all the costs are taken into account, including non-capitalizable elements such as maintenance.  Again, &#8220;no [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] analysis document for each project? That&#8217;s an excellent place to make sure that all the costs are taken into account, including non-capitalizable elements such as maintenance.  Again, &#8220;no [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kretzman</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9164</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kretzman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 23:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/#comment-9164</guid>
		<description>No, I disagree with each of your points. For one thing, offshoring IS falling out of fashion to some degree, for various reasons (e.g., political, social) not limited to the disadvantages I covered in my post.  See, for example, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/technology_at_work/archives/2009/03/cfos_say_intern.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CFOs say Offshore Outsourcing to Decline&lt;/a&gt;&quot;, from BusinessWeek.  And your point about CMM level 5? Sure, I don&#039;t disagree that there are many fine companies to outsource to, but that misses the entire point of my post: it&#039;s NOT about development alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I disagree with each of your points. For one thing, offshoring IS falling out of fashion to some degree, for various reasons (e.g., political, social) not limited to the disadvantages I covered in my post.  See, for example, &#8220;<a href="http://www.businessweek.com/technology/technology_at_work/archives/2009/03/cfos_say_intern.html" rel="nofollow">CFOs say Offshore Outsourcing to Decline</a>&#8220;, from BusinessWeek.  And your point about CMM level 5? Sure, I don&#8217;t disagree that there are many fine companies to outsource to, but that misses the entire point of my post: it&#8217;s NOT about development alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VICTOR singh</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/comment-page-1/#comment-9163</link>
		<dc:creator>VICTOR singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/02/14/offshore-development-the-reasons-why-not/#comment-9163</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s my take, 

The disadvantages/risks  presented by you , have already been known and worked out since long. The process of outsourcing is there since a decade now and if there were any serious risks/implications , it would have met its natural demise by now. 

Most of the outsourcing are done to companies which are CMM levele 5 ( a standard devised by the US itself)  and they meet higher standards than the development environment in the outsourcer comany itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my take, </p>
<p>The disadvantages/risks  presented by you , have already been known and worked out since long. The process of outsourcing is there since a decade now and if there were any serious risks/implications , it would have met its natural demise by now. </p>
<p>Most of the outsourcing are done to companies which are CMM levele 5 ( a standard devised by the US itself)  and they meet higher standards than the development environment in the outsourcer comany itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

