<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Financial metrics for IT: the holy grail of ROI, and how it misses the point: Part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1</link>
	<description>Intensely practical tips on information technology management, by Peter Kretzman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:24:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Practical CIO: Difficulties in project prioritization &#38; selection, part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8577</link>
		<dc:creator>The Practical CIO: Difficulties in project prioritization &#38; selection, part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 22:21:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/#comment-8577</guid>
		<description>[...] So let&#8217;s turn to a practical, doable approach that I&#8217;ve seen help considerably.  First, you have to establish ground rules about the process of project selection, and they have to be, collectively, wiser than the ineffective approaches that are outlined above. Most importantly, those ground rules have to cover both of the main dimensions of a disciplined project selection, as I&#8217;ve discussed in detail before: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So let&#8217;s turn to a practical, doable approach that I&#8217;ve seen help considerably.  First, you have to establish ground rules about the process of project selection, and they have to be, collectively, wiser than the ineffective approaches that are outlined above. Most importantly, those ground rules have to cover both of the main dimensions of a disciplined project selection, as I&#8217;ve discussed in detail before: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Can we&#8221; &#38; &#8220;Should we&#8221;: two dimensions of evaluating projects under consideration, not just ROI! www.peterkretzman.com #CIO - Twitoaster</title>
		<link>http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8563</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Can we&#8221; &#38; &#8220;Should we&#8221;: two dimensions of evaluating projects under consideration, not just ROI! www.peterkretzman.com #CIO - Twitoaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/financial-metrics-for-it-the-holy-grail-of-roi-and-how-it-misses-the-point-part-1/#comment-8563</guid>
		<description>[...] we&quot; &amp; &quot;Should we&quot;: two dimensions of evaluating projects under consideration, not just ROI! http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8221; &amp; &#8220;Should we&#8221;: two dimensions of evaluating projects under consideration, not just ROI! <a href="http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/.." rel="nofollow">http://www.peterkretzman.com/2008/03/19/..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

